Public discussion This is a public discussion in Tagging forum.
Simon Dale replied 9 years ago.
You can use #hashtags in areas, however I think you are suggesting we pull them out and present them differently.
We are currently working out whether to pull back on some of the structured tags. I have no problems using this forum to discuss further rock types or changes to structured tags.
Peter Monks replied 9 years ago.
I didn't seem to be able to enter a #hashtag into any of the structured tag fields - PEBCAK?
Peter Monks replied 9 years ago.
Oh and some of the common local rock types that I miss are: chert (sedimentary), serpentinite (metamorphic), and breccia (igneous).
Simon Dale replied 9 years ago.
I have logged the missing rock types here:
https://github.com/theCrag/website/issues/1930
You enter #anyhashtag into the description fields. It's possibly worthwhile considering using the structured fields as a mechanisim to enter general hash tags as well. I have logged this here:
GeorgD replied 3 years ago.
See https://www.thecrag.com/en/article/hashtagging for documentation with details.
Showing all 6 messages.
You are not part of this discussion.
Peter Monks started this discussion 9 years ago.
Extending structured tags, or allowing #hashtags on areas / crags etc.?
I repeatedly find that the "rock type" tags are too limiting, but right now it's not possible to either extend the list of "official" rock type tags, or use a #hashtag at the area / crag etc. level.
Any thoughts on either allowing the structured tags to be extended in some controlled fashion (e.g. via some kind of controlled, collaborative proposal & approval process), and/or allowing #hashtags to be used at the crag / area / etc. level?