Help

Ithumba Hill

  • Grade context: UK
1
FR
3a+

Description

Ithumba Hill, which should not be confused with another hill also called lthumba, east of the Athi River in lower Kitui, rises out of the plains north of Simba. Ithumba Hill can be seea from the main Nairobi-Mombasa road between Emali and Simba - the big easterly precipice is particularly prominent from here.

The rock is gneiss, and slants at at an excellent angle for climbing. The type of climbing is similar to that of Lukenya, but the rocks are more impressive than anything there, not excluding the Main Face [Editor's note - personal opinion from 1949, take with a pinch of salt]. Whether the Ithumba rocks, as a whole, will give as much fun as Lukenya, though, remains to be seen, they might.

As with Lukenya, Ithumba is easily accessible to the motorist, the main face being within 200 metres of the nearest road. It is only 160 km from Nairobi, the first 134 of which (Nairobi to Emali) are along the main Mombasa road, and the crag could well be visited from Nairobi in the course of a long weekend. The dry weather is best, because in the rains the Muoni River, which must be crossed, may be in spate. [Ed. a 2023 recce is needed to check access now].

The road which skirts the east face of Ithumba passes through tall shady trees near the base of the crag, and this locality is suitable for a campsite. There is water locally, the nearest being 6 km away at Mbulutini, but this is too brackish to drink. The nearest good water is at a spring which feeds the Masai dam dear the railway half a mile west of Simba. The country immediately east of Irhumba is mostly uninhabited and covered with thick bush. There are rhino here, but it is unlikely that a climber will be molested in the immediate vicinity of the hill, although those who want to roam in the bush should carry a rifle.

Ithumba is at an altitude of around 1300 m, rising 213 m from the surrounding plains. The main face is 91 m high (3,800 to 4,100 figures by aneroid).

The main face is intersected by series of approximately horizontal terraces which (unfortunately, perhaps) provide a number of easy ways off the rocks. Only one route has been done to date on this face - the Aloe Climb, described below - but there should be many other climbs awaiting discovery both here and on the subsidiary tocks along the south flank of the hill. The photographs give a fair idea of the sort of climbing to be expected the only things I don't like about this crag are the belays. These are even smaller than on Lukenya, the average being a couple of thumbnails high. They are solid enough, but I can never make up my mind how they should be used. Should one lean trustfully on the belay, making little use of the normally inadequate stance below, or should one perch precariously on the stance, making little use of the belay, in which case as the loop is not pulled off, it will almost certainly flop off.

©

Access issues inherited from Kenya

Access in Kenya ranges from very simple (especially in National Parks and Lukenya) to totally impossible.

Please do not pay to climb (outside of National Parks and Lukenya) as you'll ruin access for everyone else.

If you encounter any access issues, please notify the Mountain Club of Kenya so we can monitor and deal with it: https://www.mck.or.ke/contact

©

Approach

[Ed. to be checked in 2023 - the information below dates from 1949] From Emali there are three alternative routes to lthumba:

  1. Via the Makueni road, Hide Banda and Mbulutini (23 km, see accompanying map)

  2. Along the main road to Simba (18 km, thence via Mbulutini (14 km)).

  3. From Simba via the track which passes Nguu Hill (23 km).

The second loute is the best, the surface being very fair (suitable for cars) and the crossing of the Muoni River at Simba, though steep, is usually in good order.

The first route is not bad, but the Mbulutini crossing is less well kept up. The third route is rough and much overgrown.

The easy way up the hill is to skirt the bottom of the north face for a quarter of a mile, then slant back up a steep, open slope which leads to the top (see map), There is also another route, but it is steep and rough, up the south slope.

©

Ethic inherited from Kenya

If you want to open new climbs in Kenya, kindly contact the Mountain Club of Kenya (www.mck.or.ke). We'll be happy to help!

Here is our bolting policy, please abide by it: http://mountainclubkenya.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Bolting-Policy.pdf

©

History

History timeline chart

First discovered and climbed in 1949 by M. E. W. North.

©

Some content has been provided under license from: © Mountain Club of Kenya (Copyright Mountain Club of Kenya)

Routes

Add route(s) Add topo Reorder Bulk edit Convert grades
Grade Route

The climb takes its name from a prominent patch of aloes just below the main terrace which bissects the crag, just to the right of Stance 4 in Plate 4. It can also be seen as a dark patch in Plate 3, just to the right of the point where the terrace begins to fall away to the left. The route looks a little intimidating from below, but is not as hard as it looks. Plate 3 gives the best impression of the general angle. The climb was led direct on 26th September, 1948, without previous reconnaissance, by J. W. Howard, with J. W. Balfour and M. W. E. North as his party. Owing to the lack of belays the pitches are long, and it is advisable to have 30 m of rope for each man. The length of each pitch was estimated (not measured) and the total length would appear to be about 134 m, the vertical interval being 91 m.

  1. 24 m. The start (marked by a cairn) somewhat below the right end of a vertical wall. The pitch is up easy rocks diagonally to the right, avoiding the wall.

  2. 24 m. Traverse left for a short way, over the top of the wall, then proceed up rough, steep slabs to a minute belay and stance, I found the last 3 m tricky. This is a delightful pitch with small holds on first-class rock, spectacular and exposed.

  3. 27 m. Straight up, leaving a large semi-detached boulder on the right and the aloe patch on the left, to the main terrace.

  4. 12 m. Above the terrace is a short steep wall which is perhaps the hardest bit of the climb. It was ascended by moving a few yards to the left along the terrace, taking a short slant to the left, then traversing right on small holds to the point where the gradient eases. This brings one out on the top of the wall, after which the route leads diagonally up to the left to a good stance and belay.

  5. 24 m. Straight up a steep face on excellent holds to where the grass begins.

  6. 21 m. Here we traversed to the right up grass on slabs round the final butress, but this might, perhaps, be taken direct.

Pitch 4 was Balfour's Waterloo. He couldn't manage the traverse to the right on the small holds, mainly, I think, because his reach is shorter than Howard's or mine, and after several minutes' struggle he made a jump for a hand-hold, missed it and came unstuck. He was held from above of course, though from a little to one side. As his weight came on the roper I was astonished how it stretched. The neatest parallel that occurs to me is that of a yo-yo, the effect being heightened by Balfour's expression of yo-yo-like (or do I mean Yogi-like ?) impassivity as he catapulted down.

FA: J. W. Howard, J. W. Balfour & M. E W. North, 1948

Did you know?

Did you know that you can create an account to record, track and share your climbing ascents? Thousands of climbers are already doing this.

Accommodations nearby more Hide

Share this

Fri 26 May
Check out what is happening in Ithumba Hill.

Get a detailed insight with a timeline showing

  • Ticks by climbers like you
  • Discussions of the community
  • Updates to the index by our users
  • and many more things.

Login to see the timeline!

Deutsch English Español Français Italiano 한국어 Português 中文